Current:Home > ScamsAmazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa -FinTechWorld
Amazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa
View
Date:2025-04-18 23:08:40
Amazon will pay more than $30 million in fines to settle alleged privacy violations involving its voice assistant Alexa and doorbell camera Ring, according to federal filings.
In one lawsuit, the Federal Trade Commission claims the tech company violated privacy laws by keeping recordings of children's conversations with its voice assistant Alexa, and in another that its employees have monitored customers' Ring camera recordings without their consent.
The FTC alleges Amazon held onto children's voice and geolocation data indefinitely, illegally used it to improve its algorithm and kept transcripts of their interactions with Alexa despite parents' requests to delete them.
The alleged practices would violate the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA, which requires online companies to alert and obtain consent from parents when they gather data for children under age 13 and allow parents to delete the data at will.
In addition to the $25 million civil penalty, Amazon would not be able to use data that has been requested to be deleted. The company also would have to remove children's inactive Alexa accounts and be required to notify its customers about the FTC's actions against the company.
"Amazon's history of misleading parents, keeping children's recordings indefinitely, and flouting parents' deletion requests violated COPPA and sacrificed privacy for profits," said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a statement. "COPPA does not allow companies to keep children's data forever for any reason, and certainly not to train their algorithms."
Until September 2019, Alexa's default settings were to store recordings and transcripts indefinitely. Amazon said it uses the recordings to better understand speech patterns and respond to voice commands, the complaint says.
After the FTC intervened at the time, Amazon added a setting to automatically delete data after three or 18 months, but still kept the indefinite setting as the default.
Amazon said in a statement it disagrees with the FTC's findings and does not believe it violated any laws.
"We take our responsibilities to our customers and their families very seriously," it said. "We have consistently taken steps to protect customer privacy by providing clear privacy disclosures and customer controls, conducting ongoing audits and process improvements, and maintaining strict internal controls to protect customer data."
The company said it requires parental consent for all children's profiles, provides a Children's Privacy Disclosure elaborating on how it uses children's data, allows child recordings and transcripts to be deleted in the Alexa app and erases child profiles that have been inactive for at least 18 months.
More than 800,000 children under age 13 have their own Alexa accounts, according to the complaint.
The FTC claims that when these issues were brought to Amazon's attention, it did not take action to remedy them.
In a separate lawsuit, the FTC seeks a $5.8 million fine for Amazon over claims employees and contractors at Ring — a home surveillance company Amazon bought in 2018 — had full access to customers' videos.
Amazon is also accused of not taking its security protections seriously, as hackers were able to break into two-way video streams to sexually proposition people, call children racial slurs and physically threaten families for ransom.
Despite this, the FTC says, Ring did not implement multi-factor authentication until 2019.
In addition to paying the $5.8 million, which will be issued as customer refunds, Ring would have to delete customers' videos and faces from before 2018, notify customers about the FTC's actions and report any unauthorized access to videos to the FTC.
"Ring's disregard for privacy and security exposed consumers to spying and harassment," Levine said. "The FTC's order makes clear that putting profit over privacy doesn't pay."
The proposed orders require approval from federal judges.
veryGood! (66)
Related
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Jalen Brunson, Knicks put 76ers on brink of elimination with Game 4 win
- Philips will pay $1.1 billion to resolve US lawsuits over breathing machines that expel debris
- CDC: ‘Vampire facials’ at an unlicensed spa in New Mexico led to HIV infections in three women
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- CBS News poll finds Biden-Trump race tight in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin
- AIGM: Crypto Exchange and IEO
- Philips will pay $1.1 billion to resolve US lawsuits over breathing machines that expel debris
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Russia attacks Ukrainian energy sector as Kyiv launches drones at southern Russia
Ranking
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- White House Correspondents' Dinner overshadowed by protests against Israel-Hamas war
- Runner dies after receiving emergency treatment at Nashville race, organizers say
- Kim Kardashian Debuts Icy Blonde Hair Transformation
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- 2 dead, 1 hurt after 350,000-pound load detaches from 18-wheeler and pins vehicle in Texas
- Two more people sentenced for carjacking and kidnapping an FBI employee in South Dakota
- Thunder's Mark Daigneault wins NBA Coach of the Year after leading OKC to top seed in West
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Churchill Downs president on steps taken to improve safety of horses, riders
Who wants to be a millionaire? How your IRA can help you get there
Bronx dog owner mauled to death by his pit bull
Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
AIGM: Crypto Exchange and IEO
Interstate near Arizona-New Mexico line reopens after train derailment as lingering fuel burns off
U.K. man charged with Russia-backed arson attack on Ukraine-linked site in London