Current:Home > NewsMassachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy" -FinTechWorld
Massachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy"
View
Date:2025-04-12 17:48:26
So-called legacy college admissions — or giving preference to the children of alumni — is coming under new scrutiny following the Supreme Court's ruling last week that scraps the use of affirmative action to pick incoming students.
Lawmakers in Massachusetts are proposing a new fee that would be levied on the state's colleges and universities that use legacy preferences when admitting students, including Harvard University and Williams College, a highly ranked small liberal arts college. Any money raised by the fee would then be used to fund community colleges within the state.
The proposed law comes as a civil rights group earlier this month sued Harvard over legacy admissions at the Ivy League school, alleging the practice discriminates against students of color by giving an unfair advantage to the mostly White children of alumni. Harvard and Williams declined to comment on the proposed legislation.
Highly ranked schools such as Harvard have long relied on admissions strategies that, while legal, are increasingly sparking criticism for giving a leg up to mostly White, wealthy students. Legacy students, the children of faculty and staff, recruited athletes and kids of wealthy donors represented 43% of the White students admitted to Harvard, a 2019 study found.
"Legacy preference, donor preference and binding decision amount to affirmative action for the wealthy," Massachusetts Rep. Simon Cataldo, one of the bill's co-sponsors, told CBS MoneyWatch.
The Massachusetts lawmakers would also fine colleges that rely on another strategy often criticized as providing an unfair advantage to students from affluent backgrounds: early-decision applications, or when students apply to a school before the general admissions round.
Early decision usually has a higher acceptance rate than the general admissions pool, but it typically draws wealthier applicants
because early applicants may not know how much financial aid they could receive before having to decide on whether to attend.
Because Ivy League colleges now routinely cost almost $90,000 a year, it's generally the children of the very rich who can afford to apply for early decision.
"At highly selective schools, the effect of these policies is to elevate the admissions chances of wealthy students above higher-achieving students who don't qualify as a legacy or donor prospect, or who need to compare financial aid packages before committing to a school," Cataldo said.
$100 million from Harvard
The proposed fee as part of the bill would be levied on the endowments of colleges and universities that rely on such strategies. Cataldo estimated that the law would generate over $120 million in Massachusetts each year, with $100 million of that stemming from Harvard.
That's because Harvard has a massive endowment of $50.9 billion, making it one of the nation's wealthiest institutions of higher education. In 2020, the university had the largest endowment in the U.S., followed by Yale and the University of Texas college system, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.
Not all colleges allow legacy admissions. Some institutions have foresworn the practice, including another Massachusetts institution, MIT. The tech-focused school also doesn't use binding early decision.
"Just to be clear: we don't do legacy," MIT said in an admissions blog post that it points to as explaining its philosophy. "[W]e simply don't care if your parents (or aunt, or grandfather, or third cousin) went to MIT."
It added, "So to be clear: if you got into MIT, it's because you got into MIT. Simple as that."
"Good actors" in higher education, like MIT, wouldn't be impacted by the proposed fee, Cataldo noted.
- In:
- College
veryGood! (76)
Related
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Elon Musk’s Ex-Wife Talulah Riley Marries Love Actually’s Thomas Brodie-Sangster
- A charge for using FaceTime? Apple made no such announcement | Fact check
- Late Jeopardy! host Alex Trebek to be honored with new Forever stamp
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Shooting at a party in Alabama’s capital leaves 13 injured, officials say
- Staples introduces free backpack and school supply recycling program: See what items they accept
- Water emergency halts tourist arrivals at Italy’s popular Capri island
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- My day at the ballpark with Mr. and Mrs. Met, the first family of MLB mascots
Ranking
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Cybertruck sales are picking up: Could the polarizing EV push Tesla's market share higher?
- NHRA legend John Force taken to hospital after funny car engine explodes
- 'He's got a swagger to him': QB Jayden Daniels makes strong first impression on Commanders
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Orange County judge who says wife's shooting was accidental to be tried on murder charge
- Taylor Swift posts selfie with Prince William, kids and goes IG official with Travis Kelce
- One dead, seven injured after shooting at Kentucky nightclub
Recommendation
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
5 convicted of operating massive, illegal streaming service called Jetflicks
Johnny Furphy experienced rapid ascension from Kansas freshman to NBA draft prospect
COVID summer wave grows, especially in West, with new variant LB.1 on the rise
'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
As homeowner's insurance prices climb, more Americans ask: Is it worth it?
Barry Sanders reveals he had 'health scare' related to his heart last weekend
Why Reggie Jackson's powerful remarks on racism still resonate today