Current:Home > MySenators urge Biden to end duty-free treatment for packages valued at less than $800 -FinTechWorld
Senators urge Biden to end duty-free treatment for packages valued at less than $800
EchoSense Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-07 16:53:45
WASHINGTON (AP) — Two U.S. senators looking to crack down on the number of packages from China that enter the country duty-free are calling on President Joe Biden to take executive action, saying U.S. manufacturers can’t compete with low-cost competitors they say rely on forced labor and state subsidies in key sectors.
U.S. trade law allows packages bound for American consumers and valued below a certain threshold to enter tariff-free. That threshold, under a category known as “de minimis,” stands at $800 per person, per day. The majority of the imports are retail products purchased online.
Alarmed by the large increase in such shipments from China, lawmakers in both chambers have filed legislation to alter how the U.S. treats imports valued at less than $800. Now, Sens. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, and Rick Scott, R-Fla., have sent a letter to Biden calling on him to end the duty-free treatment altogether for those products.
“The situation has reached a tipping point where vast sections of American manufacturing and retail are at stake if de minimis is not immediately addressed,” the senators wrote.
Brown and Scott singled out Temu, Shein and AliExpress in their letter as companies that “unfairly” benefit from the duty-free treatment of their goods. The surge in shipments, they said, hurts big box stores and other retailers in the U.S.
“This out-of-control problem impacts the safety and livelihoods of Americans, outsourcing not only our manufacturing, but also our retail sectors to China, which — as you know — systematically utilizes slave labor among other unconscionable practices to undermine our economy,” the senators said.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter, which was provided to The Associated Press.
Congress raised the threshold for expedited and duty-fee imports into the U.S. from $200 back in 2016. The argument for doing so is that it speeds up the pace of commerce and lowers costs for consumers. It also allows U.S. Customs and Border Protection to focus its resources on the bigger-ticket items that generate more tariff revenue for the federal government.
The change in duty-free treatment has led to a significant increase in “de minimis” shipments, from about 220 million packages that year to 685 million in fiscal year 2022.
The higher $800 threshold for duty-free treatment has strong backing from many in the business community. John Pickel, a senior director at the National Foreign Trade Council, a trade association that represents a broad range of companies, said that doing as the senators are urging would increase the amount of time it takes for shipments to arrive as they go through a more cumbersome inspection process at the border. And those products would cost more.
“The increase from $200 to $800 has not really been a significant driver in terms of volume,” Pickel said. “What’s really driving interest in the use of de minimis is the desire for consumers to access their products quickly and at a lower transaction cost.”
He said the average shipment that comes into the U.S. through the de minimis category is $55. But that cost would roughly double for the consumer if de minimis treatment no longer applied because importers would have to hire a customs broker and pay additional processing fees and the import duty.
veryGood! (28285)
Related
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- A New Program Like FDR’s Civilian Conservation Corps Could Help the Nation Fight Climate Change and Transition to Renewable Energy
- Extreme Heat Risks May Be Widely Underestimated and Sometimes Left Out of Major Climate Reports
- A U.S. Virgin Islands Oil Refinery Had Yet Another Accident. Residents Are Demanding Answers
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Unwinding the wage-price spiral
- Collin Gosselin Pens Message of Gratitude to Dad Jon Amid New Chapter
- You'll Unconditionally Love Katy Perry's Latest Hair Transformation
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- For the First Time, Nations Band Together in a Move Toward Ending Plastics Pollution
Ranking
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Does Another Plastics Plant in Louisiana’s ‘Cancer Alley’ Make Sense? A New Report Says No
- Extreme Heat Risks May Be Widely Underestimated and Sometimes Left Out of Major Climate Reports
- A deal's a deal...unless it's a 'yo-yo' car sale
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Inside Clean Energy: Illinois Faces (Another) Nuclear Power Standoff
- Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick’s Son James Wilkie Has a Red Carpet Glow Up
- ESPYS 2023: See the Complete List of Nominees
Recommendation
Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
Republicans Seize the ‘Major Questions Doctrine’ to Block Biden’s Climate Agenda
Looking for a New Everyday Tote? Save 58% On This Bag From Reese Witherspoon’s Draper James
Ariana Grande Kicks Off 30th Birthday Celebrations Early With This Wickedly Festive POV
San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
Our 2023 valentines
The social cost of carbon: a powerful tool and ethics nightmare
WHO declares aspartame possibly carcinogenic. Here's what to know about the artificial sweetener.