Current:Home > MyFossil Fuel Subsidies Top $450 Billion Annually, Study Says -FinTechWorld
Fossil Fuel Subsidies Top $450 Billion Annually, Study Says
View
Date:2025-04-17 02:17:32
The governments of the world’s 20 largest economies spend more than $450 billion annually subsidizing the fossil fuel industry, a new analysis has concluded, four times more than what they spend on renewable energy.
The report by Oil Change International, a Washington-based advocacy organization, and the Overseas Development Institute, a British research group, calculates the amount of money the G20 nations provide to oil, gas and coal companies through tax breaks, low cost loans and government investments. It comes just weeks before country representatives convene in Paris to forge a climate deal that aims to put the global energy economy on a path to zero emissions, and it underscores the obstacles this effort faces.
“If the G20 leaders want to be credible ahead of the Paris talks, they need to show they’re serious,” said Alex Doukas, a senior campaigner at OCI and one of the authors of the report. “Handing money to fossil fuel companies undermines their credibility.”
Doukas said phasing out subsidies should be a top priority because it hinders the transition to clean energy at the scale needed.
Researchers at Oil Change International tracked three main ways in which governments subsidize fossil fuel companies:
National subsidies: Direct spending by governments to build out fossil fuel infrastructure and tax exemptions for investments in drilling and mining.
State owned companies: Government-owned oil and gas companies that benefit from government involvement.
Public financing: Investments in fossil fuel production through government-backed banks and other financial institutions.
The subsidy data was collected from sources including government budgets and commercial databases. Doukas cautioned that some of the subsidies were not easily quantifiable and the figures in the report are likely underestimates. Still, the report gives a picture of the magnitude of the investments in fossil fuels, he said.
Countries vary in how they subsidize the fossil fuel industry. In China, for instance, a majority of the oil and gas companies are owned by the state and it invested more than $75 billion a year in 2013 and 2014 in fossil fuel production.
The vast majority of subsides to the industry in the U.S., on the other hand, are through tax breaks. The U.S. provided at least $20 billion a year in tax exemptions for fossil fuel companies in 2013 and 2014.
Scientists have warned that if the worst effects of climate change are to be avoided, global temperature rise must be kept under 2 degrees Celsius. In order to do that, researchers have estimated that we must keep at least three quarters of the global fossil fuel reserves in the ground.
“Exploration subsidies [in the U.S.] are particularly pernicious,” said Doukas. “At the very moment when we know we have to keep three-fourth of the fossil fuels in the ground, we’re using public money to incentivize their development.”
The Oil Change International’s analysis follows a report by the International Energy Agency this week that concluded that the world’s transition to a low-carbon energy is too slow. Low oil prices and an increasing reliance on coal in developing countries has impeded the growth in renewables, the agency found.
The IEA has also estimated that countries spent $121 billion in 2013 on renewable energy. That figure is about a quarter of the amount spent on fossil fuels in the G20 countries alone, according to the OCI-ODI analysis.
“Fossil fuel subsidies are public enemy number one for the growth of renewable energy,” Fatih Birol, head of the IEA, told the Guardian. “I don’t understand some countries—they have renewable energy programs and at the same time they have subsidies for fossil fuels. This is, in my view, myopic.”
veryGood! (63)
Related
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- Dylan Guenther scores first goal in Utah Hockey Club history
- North Carolina lawmakers pass $273M Helene relief bill with voting changes to more counties
- The Daily Money: Lawmakers target shrinkflation
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Ethel Kennedy, widow of Robert F. Kennedy, in hospital after suffering from stroke
- Geomagnetic storm could hinder radios, satellites as Hurricane Milton makes landfall
- Opinion: Let's hope New York Liberty vs. Minnesota Lynx WNBA Finals goes all five games.
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Duke Energy warns of over 1 million outages after Hurricane Milton hits
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Hmong Minnesotans who support Tim Walz hope to sway fellow Hmong communities in swing states
- Erin Foster Reveals the Real-Life Easter Egg Included in Nobody Wants This
- Everything you need to know about charging your EV on the road
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Open season on holiday shopping: How Walmart, Amazon and others give buyers a head start
- Nazi-looted Monet artwork returned to family generations later
- Sandra Bullock Makes Rare Red Carpet Appearance With Keanu Reeves for Speed Reunion
Recommendation
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
Fact-Checking the Viral Conspiracies in the Wake of Hurricane Helene
Best Amazon Prime Day 2024 Cleaning Deals – Save Up to 64% on Bissell, Dyson & More, Finds Starting at $4
Why RHOSLC's Lisa Barlow Is Calling This Costar a F--king B--ch
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Luke Combs, Eric Church team up for Hurricane Helene relief concert in North Carolina
Johnny Manziel surprises Diego Pavia; says Vanderbilt's upset of Alabama 'feels like 2012'
Social Security’s scheduled cost of living increase ‘won’t make a dent’ for some retirees