Current:Home > MarketsAntisemitic Posts Are Rarely Removed By Social Media Companies, A Study Finds -FinTechWorld
Antisemitic Posts Are Rarely Removed By Social Media Companies, A Study Finds
View
Date:2025-04-12 22:53:54
Five major social media companies, including Facebook and Twitter, took no action to remove 84% of antisemitic posts, a new report from the Center to Counter Digital Hate (CCDH) found.
Despite promising to crack down on antisemitic hate, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube and TikTok did not act on these posts even as they were flagged through the existing tools used for reporting malignant content.
Researchers from the CCDH, a nongovernmental organization based in the United States and the United Kingdom, examined 714 anti-Jewish posts on the five platforms published between May and June. Collectively, they had been viewed 7.3 million times, the report said.
"The study of antisemitism has taught us a lot of things ... if you allow it space to grow, it will metastasize. It is a phenomenally resilient cancer in our society," Imran Ahmed, the CEO of CCDH told NPR.
He said social media spaces have been "unable or unwilling" to take action against antisemitic posts effectively. This study differs from others, he said, in that CCDH wanted to prove that social media companies aren't unable to moderate content — they just choose not to.
That's why Ahmed and his team chose to focus on posts that had already been flagged to social media companies through the companies' own internal systems. And still, even following their own standards, the social media companies failed to act. (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube and TikTok have not yet returned request for comment.)
For posts that included antisemitic conspiracy theories about 9/11, the pandemic and Jewish people controlling world affairs, social media companies didn't take action on 89% of them. These platforms also didn't act on 80% of posts denying the Holocaust, as well as 70% of posts with neo-Nazi and white supremacist images.
In October, Facebook shifted their policy on handling hate speech and Holocaust denials, saying they would now "prohibit any content that denies or distorts the Holocaust."
CEO Mark Zuckerberg posted on Facebook saying, "I've struggled with the tension between standing for free expression and the harm caused by minimizing or denying the horror of the Holocaust ... with the current state of the world, I believe this is the right balance."
But the report from CCDH shows that of all five social media platforms examined, Facebook was the worst offender, failing to act on 89% of antisemitic posts.
"There is this enormous gulf between what they claim and what they do," Ahmed said.
The report also shows the lasting impact of hashtags on Instagram, Twitter and TikTok, all platforms that allow antisemitic hashtags. Ones like #fakejews and #killthejews that were included in the 714 posts gained 3.3 million impressions, the report said.
TikTok specifically is failing to ban accounts that directly abuse Jewish users, the CCDH said; according to the study, the platform removes just 5% of accounts that do things like sending direct messages about Holocaust denial.
And the hate speech that spreads online doesn't just stay online. Several studies show links between the prevalence of racist speech on social media platforms and hate crimes in the area. In Germany, for example, anti-refugee posts on Facebook were correlated with physical assaults against refugees.
"There is a reflexive interaction between online and offline racism, they reinforce each other," Ahmed said.
In an offline world, there are consequences to antisemitic behavior, he said.
But in the online space, Ahmed said, there are no limits, and people become radicalized without any boundaries.
"The online spaces then have an effect on offline spaces because these people have worsened," Ahmed said. "The failure of these companies is a cost that's paid in lives."
Editor's note: Facebook and Google, parent organization of YouTube, are among NPR's financial supporters.
veryGood! (22)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Gayle King Defends Justin Timberlake Following His DWI Arrest
- Kylie Jenner cries over 'exhausting' comments saying she looks 'old'
- Rapper Travis Scott arrested in Miami Beach for misdemeanor trespassing and public intoxication
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Roller coaster strikes and critically injures man in restricted area of Ohio theme park
- Amtrack trains suspended from Philadelphia to New Haven by circuit breaker malfunction
- Traveler from Missouri stabbed to death and his wife critically injured in attack at Nebraska highway rest area
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Biden administration old growth forest proposal doesn’t ban logging, but still angers industry
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Gayle King Defends Justin Timberlake Following His DWI Arrest
- After Drake battle, Kendrick Lamar turns victory lap concert into LA unity celebration
- Caitlin Clark is proving naysayers wrong. Rookie posts a double-double as Fever win
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- After wildfires ravage Ruidoso, New Mexico, leaving 2 dead, floods swamp area
- Selling Sunset’s Chelsea Lazkani Reveals How She’s Navigating Divorce “Mess”
- Amtrack trains suspended from Philadelphia to New Haven by circuit breaker malfunction
Recommendation
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
Coming out saved my life. LGBTQ+ ex-Christians like me deserve to be proud of ourselves.
Boys charged in alleged antisemitic gang rape of 12-year-old girl in France
Onions are the third most popular vegetable in America. Here's why that's good.
What to watch: O Jolie night
Kane Brown and Wife Katelyn Brown Welcome Baby No. 3
U.S. bans on gasoline-powered leaf blowers grow, as does blowback from landscaping industry
The Supreme Court upholds a tax on foreign income over a challenge backed by business interests