Current:Home > ScamsMexico’s president vows to eliminate regulatory, oversight agencies, claiming they are ‘useless’ -FinTechWorld
Mexico’s president vows to eliminate regulatory, oversight agencies, claiming they are ‘useless’
NovaQuant View
Date:2025-04-09 14:20:16
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico’s president vowed Monday to try to eliminate almost all remaining government oversight and regulatory agencies before he leaves office on Sept. 30, claiming they are “useless” and cost too much.
“There are a lot of wasteful agencies that do not serve any purpose,” President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said. “All of these supposedly autonomous agencies have to disappear.”
He vowed to send a bill to Congress to eliminate the federal anti-monopoly commission and agencies regulating telecommunications, the energy market and access to government information.
The president has accused the anti-monopoly commission of trying to block his efforts to increase the power of government-owned oil and energy companies. He has claimed the information access agency processes too many freedom of information requests from the public.
It is unclear whether López Obrador has the votes in Congress to make the changes. Most of the agencies are enshrined in the Constitution, and changing it requires a two-thirds vote.
López Obrador’s dislike of any kind of oversight, including separation of powers, has been a hallmark of his administration.
He has sought to cut funds for the judicial branch and eliminated requirements for environmental impact statements on government projects. He cut funds for the electoral watchdog organization and sought to limit its powers to enforce electoral rules.
López Obrador had previously mentioned his desire to eliminate external oversight agencies in 2020.
The watchdog groups were created by López Obrador’s predecessors, often to regulate areas that were once state-dominated, like the oil and electricity industries. Those sectors were opened to private competition, something López Obrador also opposes.
veryGood! (2442)
Related
- Trump's 'stop
- California’s Climate Reputation Tarnished by Inaction and Oil Money
- One of the most violent and aggressive Jan. 6 rioters sentenced to more than 7 years
- How Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Iowa's 6-week abortion ban signed into law, but faces legal challenges
- Tens of millions across U.S. continue to endure scorching temperatures: Everyone needs to take this heat seriously
- Reimagining Coastal Cities as Sponges to Help Protect Them From the Ravages of Climate Change
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Race, Poverty, Farming and a Natural Gas Pipeline Converge In a Rural Illinois Township
Ranking
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Compare the election-fraud claims Fox News aired with what its stars knew
- A Bankruptcy Judge Lets Blackjewel Shed Coal Mine Responsibilities in a Case With National Implications
- Hilaria Baldwin Admits She's Sometimes Alec Baldwin's Mommy
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- California’s Climate Reputation Tarnished by Inaction and Oil Money
- An Indigenous Group’s Objection to Geoengineering Spurs a Debate About Social Justice in Climate Science
- Inside Clean Energy: A Steel Giant Joins a Growing List of Companies Aiming for Net-Zero by 2050
Recommendation
Travis Hunter, the 2
Kim Kardashian and Hailey Bieber Reveal If They’ve Joined Mile High Club
Mission: Impossible co-star Simon Pegg talks watching Tom Cruise's stunt: We were all a bit hysterical
Warming Trends: New Rules for California Waste, Declining Koala Bears and Designs Meant to Help the Planet
The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
This group gets left-leaning policies passed in red states. How? Ballot measures
Titanic Submersible Disappearance: Debris Found in Search Area
Meet the judge deciding the $1.6 billion defamation case against Fox News